<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/feed.css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Idiomdrottning</title>
  <subtitle type="xhtml">
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <ol><li><a href="/blog">/blog</a></li>
      <li><a href="/blog/en">/blog/en</a></li>
      <li>/blog/psychology</li>
      <li><a href="/blog/psychology/en">/blog/psychology/en</a></li>
</ol>
    </div>
  </subtitle>
  <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/blog/psychology"/>
  <updated>2026-04-13T13:52:43+02:00</updated>
  <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/blog/psychology</id>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/ai-vs-art"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/ai-vs-art</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/ai-vs-art">I don’t want to paint or write</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>I don’t want to paint or write long-form fiction in the age of
AI.</p>

<p>This isn’t me going on strike or anything. It’s just a report from my
soul-crushed inner landscape of not feeling like making art and not
having felt like making art for the past few years.</p>

<p>Doing <em>everything</em> by hand feels pointless and tedious like writing a
desktop app in all assembly without macros would be in the age of
compilers. “Kind of like construction work with a toothpick for a
tool.” <a href="https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/eternal-flame.en.html" title="Eternal Flame - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation">as the lyric goes</a>.</p>

<p>While combining AI and my own penstrokes into one image is taboo in
this age of anti-AI sentiment. Using AI for flatting or backgrounds or
art assistance is just as frowned upon as full-on prompt-jockeying and
slop-pushing.</p>

<p>I can’t bring myself to paint or write longform. It’s like how stairs
become that much more tedious to climb once an elevator is installed
next to them. The hacker mindset, right? We want to do things for the
first time and solve problems generally and recursively, solve a whole
class of problems in one go.</p>

<p>As a painter I embraced G’MIC and brush-editing and scripting and path
effects. 3D-modelling some blocks to help me with perspective lines
that I then painted over. The digital equivalent of stippling with a
toothbrush instead of placing dot by dot with a finetip. That was core
to my whole art ethos: I make tools in order to make my art. I’ve made
auto-masking scripts, Emacs comic lettering modes, auto-hatching
brushes, stamp sprays, feathering path effects. For writing it’s been
working on outliners and text metadata and timeline sorting tools.</p>

<p>I always try to look for the general solution.</p>

<p>Please don’t get the wrong idea that I’m trying to blame this bleak
ennui on the anti-AI crowd. I think <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/ml" title="Machine Learning—good and bad arguments against">some of their arguments are
great</a> and <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/slop-cure" title="The Cure for Slop">I don’t look at AI art either</a>. This isn’t a manifesto,
I haven’t figured out an answer yet.</p>

<p>I’m not trying to push a context where I could combine AI art and my
own art into one work, where I could make a comic mixing my own
drawings and AI, where I could figure out some way to have AI
assistance when writing that’s still primarily my own voice, without
it getting hate and without me getting bans.</p>

<p>I understand full well the reasons why it can’t be like that. People
in my bubble hate everything that AI has touched and they hate it not
out of irrationality but for good reason and I do to.</p>

<p>It’s just me feeling hopeless since everything I used to do—write,
paint, make music, write programs—that’s all gone. I don’t have any
other skills. I can’t do anything else and everything feels so
meaningless and tedious.</p>

<p>So that’s the main soulcrush: I wish I could use the tools in
conjuction with my own hand, like how a camera was both a blessing and
a curse to realistic painters. When the camera was invented it ate
that them but they could also use it as a tool for reference. But
mixing in AI with art production is rightly condemned since this time
around the camera is evil. It’s more like horse&amp;buggy vs a
gas-guzzling, earth-wrecking automobile than it is like canvas vs
lens.</p>

<h2 id="competing-with-the-machine">Competing with the machine</h2>

<p>The secondary soulcrush is that even if I make art, <em>publishing</em> that
art into this AI world doesn’t feel fun either. Not that I worry that
AI would learn from it<small> (I have consented to that. This web site has 1300 text posts and
300 images all made by me and most of them CC-BY-SA and I have not
minded if AI wanted to learn from them. That’s been OK by me. I
haven’t fought scraping)</small>, but trying to upload music into in a
world where 40% of the hit list is fully AI made just isn’t something
I want to do. I don’t want to be put on the same plate as an AI dish.</p>

<p>I know I harp on the Monet/​Turner/​Twombly exhibition all the time but
putting Twombly up with Monet and Turner felt so wrong. I don’t want
to slag Cy Twombly because I do like his art too. It’s just that it
felt like such a staring-at-finger-and-missing-the-moon moment. “Oh
these three artists all look blurry so they belong together” where
Monet and Turner are impressionists, the ultimate
<a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/brain-lateralization" title="One “left”, one “right”—brain edition">right-side-of-the-brain</a> sublime-what-you-see conduits, Twombly is a
lexical symbolist. That is the opposite.</p>

<p>If I were any one of the three them I’d feel slightly offended to be
equivocated is what I’m saying. All three of them are good but it’s
like “If you think we are the same you don’t understand what we were
trying to do”.</p>

<p>I pour my heart and soul into this stuff—I’m “painting my nightmares”
as a friend said when I was painting with him around—and I don’t want
it served up on the same menu as a bunch of machine talk.</p>

<p>Or for another version of the same metaphor: ever been to a party and
as you’re in a productive but exhausting conversation with some
privitive screwhead that you’re giving the 101 to, up comes a
even more wrongheaded schmoe and starts “agreeing” with you and now
you’ve got two problems because you’re stuck in the middle of the
original argument and the “whoah <em>what</em> did you just say?!” Completely
hecked-up new argument.</p>

<p>Yeah, yeah, when I hate AI the least I can think of it as sort of a
<a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rhizomatic" title="rhizomatic - Wiktionary, the free dictionary">rhyzomatic</a> <a href="https://wiki.lspace.org/L-space" title="L-space">L-space</a>, an organism that grew through roots of a
million voices. It’s not a machine talking, it’s us—it’s just been
filtered and composted and regrown into new meaning by this
organic-like ginormous ANN. But any such appreciation for AI I could
possibly twist and turn and force my mind into feeling, I’m gonna put
on permanent hold until the two biggest problems—first is is the
extremely externalized and un-accounted-for costs to <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/externalities" title="Externalities">the planet</a> and
<a href="https://drewdevault.com/2025/03/17/2025-03-17-Stop-externalizing-your-costs-on-me.html" title="Please stop externalizing your costs directly into my face">to other humans</a>, and second is the increased centralization of
means-of-production ownership—are solved, and it’s looking right now
like they’ll never be.</p>

<p>I’m right there with y’all: When I find out that a song I’m listening
to is AI, I turn it off. That’s happened twice now. I believe I can
tell right away when a text or image is AI made but I know for sure I
can not tell when it’s music. So it’s not out of repulsion I turn it
off. I don’t know why. I just do.</p>

<p>I fear that a misread of the main text and of this appendix is as some
sort of passive-aggressive slag agaist the AI-hating crowd. That I’m
trying to be all sly and smug and friends-romans-countrymen about it.
But that’s not it. I <em>do</em> understand where the hate against AI is
coming from. I think <em>some</em> of the arguments are really bad and I don’t
agree with those <em>parts</em> of it<small> (as a copyright hater I’m
especially sickened by those arguments
relying on a proprietarization of visual expression)</small> but I’m trying to
be super frank and transparent about that. I’m not trying to be swifty
or satirical here. We’re all stuck in this wrongheaded world during
this utterly misguided era and navigating it best we can. To the exent
that people feel threatened by AI, <strong>I do too</strong> and that’s the whole
point of this essay.</p>

<p>My entire reason for living has suddenly been swept away and with it
my footing. I don’t know what to do for a job and I don’t know what to
do for leisure. <strong>It all feels so meaningless.</strong> Don’t worry, I’m not
about to [end it][ei]—my
mental health toolbox is jam packed and I get by with a li’l help from
my friends. For now. But on an
existential and philosophical level<small> (and on an income level because
what’s my job gonna be?)</small>, I’m like what the heck? Where do
I even go from here? I don’t know how to do anything other that this.
I thought I was renaissance and multi-field with my writing and music
and art and programming and game-design but it’s all been fell-swooped
by this slop singularity. I’m too dyspraxic for woodcarving or sewing.
All I could do was this stuff.</p>

<h2 id="the-glimmers-of-hope-and-why-theyre-unbearably-faint">The glimmers of hope and why they’re unbearably faint</h2>

<p>I’m not saying never. Maybe I’ll just pick up the pen or the guitar
one day when I for some dumb reason feel like it. The most recent
batch of art I made was all pen &amp; paper. Scribbling every mermaid
scale by hand. Gillian Welch has a song lyric “We’re gonna do it
anyway even if it doesn’t pay”<small> (originally a pro-copyright screed
and that part does not sit well with a <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/stance_on_copyright" title="My current stance on copyright">copyright abolitionist</a> like
me, but that’s okay since it’s
such a great song)</small>. Yeah, maybe we are. I just don’t feel like
it and I haven’t felt like it in a long time.</p>

<p>Last time the world faced this problem, just over a hundred years ago,
what happened was modernism. When the machine (the camera, in that
case), mastered the <em>means</em> more than we could, what was left to us
was pure <em>ends</em>, <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/ds100" title="H. L. C. Jaffé, De Stijl 1917–1931, p 100">pure expression</a>. Maybe this time around the machine
has encroached a little bit too much on the expression part of
things—for sure it has on the slop algo side of things, but that
particular variety of suffering <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/slop-cure" title="The Cure for Slop">is optional</a>—but maybe it can still
become a vehicle, a communication tool for what we want to tell each other.</p>

<p><a href="/ai-colophon">AI colophon</a></p>

        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2026-01-13T11:38:14+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/ai-vs-art"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/shirking"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/shirking</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/shirking">Shirking: Unplugged in Stockholm</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>As I continue my self-racking of heart and mind to figure out why I hate smartphones and internet and screens so much, here’s one more reason I came up with and this one is not pretty. Kind of wish that I had stayed in the self-deluded dark and not figured this one out:</p>

<p>Once upon a time, a subconscious part of my own twisted mind must’ve realized that if it’s not possible for me to do something, that’s the best excuse for not having to do it. “Oh, I can’t go and check and fix and do all that for you now, I don’t have internet here.” “Oh, I didn’t see your email, I wasn’t at home.”</p>

<p>I can’t do that right now because I had to walk away from the tools.</p>

<p>I finally managed to track down this unknown impulse by thinking long and hard about just exactly <em>why</em>, as I’m trying out mods for Light Phone III, it’s so important for me to not be able to, for example, open browser or F-Droid or Termux on that thing. Like, I found myself uninstalling AntennaPod because of how it has an “open website” widget on podcasts that lets me, from there, access the open web. Other apps where I’m like “oh no from the help page or even log in screen I can break out into the open web so okay goodbye this app was good but I <strong>need</strong> to stay disconnected”. I had to ask myself why this mattered so much to me that I’m going through ridiculous hoops for it.<small> And it’s two reasons. The biggest is that I just don’t want to spend all nights and all mornings online. It’s nice to do podcasts or audiobooks late at night as long as I then have to physically leave bed in the morning and get a tablet if I wanna go online, because I’ve found again and again that if I don’t, I’ll miss breakfast, I’ll miss the entire day. Or if I can go online in the middle of the night, I’ll wake up and do that. That’s right, the even bigger reason than my laziness is my lack of impulse control. Hmm, this essay is making me doubt my own awesomeness.</small></p>

<p>Secondary reason is the aforementioned shirking. Being offline as a way to get out of work. Apparently I have this hangup that “If I <em>can</em> do it, I’m gonna keep finding myself in situations where I <em>ought</em> to do it”. My conscious mind, my values, really do want to help and say yes, to the extent that <a href="/two-wolves" title="The Two Wolves">my subconscious wants to protect myself</a> by putting up these barriers. I’m not the type of person that can just easily say “no I don’t wanna” or “I’ll get to that later, I’m doing something else now” or “I’m gonna put it on airplane mode for a few hours”. But my other brain noped out for me, ahead of time, by making sure I don’t have internet in my pocket and making sure that online is something I can and do walk away from.</p>

<p>Now, to pull back from the self-deprecation for three seconds and try to figure out how this kind of antisocial shirking-through-disconnection sometimes actually can be the responsible choice.</p>

<p>It might be the case that I can do stuff more efficiently and faster by using batching and a more appropriate and capable device like a bigger screen and a real keyboard. If I can reply to ten emails spread out over the day in a way that adds up to forty-five minutes total or even more due to context switching and mindset and resources and thumb-typing vs touch-typing, that’s an overall loss if I otherwise could’ve replied to them all in one half-an-hour window.</p>

<p>The batching can also foster a more responsible selection of duties making sure society <a href="/efficiency" title="The ruthless efficiency of spoons">gets the most out of my limited spoons</a>. If more requests come in than I can handle, batching them can help me get enough of an overview to select the most worthwhile ones.<small> (Uh, that’s not to say that I’m good at it yet and if I’ve missed some of y’all’s messages that’s more likely due to a mistake on my part than a deliberate deselection.)</small></p>

<p>Even if it can’t, the shirking might be a vital rest and recuperation and acknowledgment of limited bandwidth.</p>

<p>This is also interbraided with the other reasons for going offline, like my frustration with the mental ice age of <a href="/appified" title="Against the Appified Society">the corporate-owned, appified society</a>. Maybe <a href="/unplug-weirdo" title="Being an unplug weirdo to not be a FOSS weirdo">I can’t explain why</a> I <a href="/franklin" title="Franklin Street Statement on Freedom and Network Services">don’t want to go on Facebook</a> but if I physically <em>can’t</em> because I don’t have a smartphone with me, I don’t have to worry as much about the other person trying to convince me or bully me. Nope, sorry, I just literally can’t.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-11-25T13:34:05+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/shirking"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/boredom"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/boredom</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/boredom">Boredom and existentialism</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>I heard fourth hand with citations long forgotten that too much boredom can be dangerous, cause depression etc<small> (and some sprawlbrained people like me are extra sensitive to that)</small> but too little boredom is also unhealthy and is much more common.</p>

<p>So I’ve started practicing boredom a bit more. When I first <a href="/dumbphone-experience" title="The Dumbphone Experience">started dumbphone</a> I had a long-running, then–still-going meditation practice, and while at first I was listening to radio and music on the dumbphone, the headphone jack quickly broke leaving me bored when walking around which was horrible at first, then nice and I got used to walking without <a href="/headphones" title="My headphones, they save my life">the headphone soma</a>, then it led to me just walking less until I figured out how to hook up an old 2DS game console to play podcasts and gradually I got bored less often and when the contagion first hit my meditation practice also ended and then two years into that I got really sick.</p>

<p>And then two years after that, two years ago now, I got re-obsessed with the whole phone-hating thing, I’m hyperfixated on it, all that I eat and sleep and breathe is hatred of smartphones and of the modern web, and I am gradually getting into retro aesthetics even when it’s <a href="/antique-phone-experience" title="The Antique Phone Experience">mostly larping</a> and the for-show component is at least as important as the for-real part of it.</p>

<p>I got away from glowyglowy screens in favor of e-ink and RLCD and aural interfaces (radio and podcasts) and <a href="/books-vs-internet" title="Books vs Internet">paper books</a> both for writing and reading. Thinking all of that was my proverbial nicotine patch away from constant online and that actually facing the horrible silence would be the next step. And, it eventually was. It took me a while to get there but I’m dipping my toe in it now.</p>

<p>Not all the time and I’m not forcing myself too much. It’s more like (figuratively speaking) exercising, nudging myself a liiittle bit and then it feels nice. Maybe I’ll have headphones off on the way there and put them on on the way home or vice versa.</p>

<p>Being bored here in Stockholm<small> (where I’ve lived for almost twenty years)</small> feels like traveling. That’s a missed reference these days because these days traveling is the same as home. Your “For You”–page looks the same away as it does at home. But for me, putting away the book and headphones evoked a sense memory of travel, of more fully noticing the air, lamps, cobblestones, trees, trash fluttering in the wind, rain on the window.</p>

<p>Ironic given that Stockholm, specifically, I first started visiting only <em>after</em> I’ve gotten hooked on headphones. I’d always put on the <em>Way Beyond Blue</em> album on the repeat-all mode when I was here so if I want to evoke a feeling of traveling to Stockholm specifically, embracing the headphone life to the tunes of sweet Catatonia would be the ticket for that. But that’s not what I meant. Just that sitting at the deli counter with headphones off made me more aware of the world is all.</p>

<p>Being bored is scary, and for good reason: the brain wants to have fun, fun things makes it easier to learn and be happy and connect. But physical exercise is similarly scary-for-a-good-reason; instinctively I don’t want to give up precious, hard-won  energy on unnecessary, unplayful, <a href="/two-wolves" title="The Two Wolves">duty-bound</a> movement. Conclusion: right now, as in the past few weeks, I’ve finally re-discovered the joys of boredom, along with the pains and dreads of it and how holding on through that pain is sometimes rewarded with how alive everything is and other times is just why-am-I-even-doing-this?</p>

<p>The existential dilemma of boredom is <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxPZF_LWJaU" title="You'll Have Time - YouTube">wasting time vs tasting time</a>. At the end of all things, what will deserve the most regret? The mystic, the ascetic might think “Dang it! I should’ve embraced my curiosity, my desire to explore, I should’ve scrolled down for more videos, I should’ve let my brain cyber up and go discover and get recommended more and more and more stuff online.” And the screen junkie might think “Why did I waste it on this compulsion, this digital sugar, this junk, why did I never ever look up from this pervasive trash can I had my head stuck in all this time?”</p>

<p>Knowing whether boredom is good or bad becomes a pretty important question. I really wish I had the answer to that because that’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_wrestling_with_the_angel" title="Jacob wrestling with the angel - Wikipedia">an angel</a> I’m in a particularly nasty no-holds-barred cage fight with.</p>

<p>Until I figure out an answer for this, here’s a temporary answer, a cop-out, a Gordian solulu sidestepping that question:</p>

<p>Let’s say for the sake of argument that the experience-rich life is the better option over the staring-at-the-wall shikantaza yawnfest. Buddha don’t at me because that’s not where I’m gonna land, this is gonna be rhetorics, it’s the null hypo that we’re postulating and putting a pin in.<small> Like in a sudoku, we’re just saying <em>if</em> this is an eight, would that cause contradictions elsewere? We’re not painting in the eight with ink just yet.</small></p>

<p>Now, the next question becomes what <em>kind</em> of experiences we’d want to fill that experience-rich life with. <a href="/gtd-basics" title="GTD basics">Actually doing stuff?</a> Helping other people? Doing meaningful things? Not drowning in procrastinating and self-hatred and compulsive behavior? Okay, so step two then is thinking “we postulated how awesome and truly great the TikTok-drowned life is compared to the paint-dry life of <a href="/sitting" title="Sitting">just sitting</a>. But it’s only the <em>second</em> best compared to all the stuff I wish I could be doing <em>instead</em>.” With me so far?</p>

<p>Then step there becomes: okay, okay, what if <em>some</em> amount of deliberate boredom is what’s gonna help you get away from that second best thing into the best thing? If the anti-boredom compulsion is what’s exacerbating procrastination and leaving us unable to get going on the things that really would matter to us, and overcoming the fear of boredom is what’s gonna unlock creativity, problem-solving, even regain a tiny bit of executive function? If that is true—and I don’t have the answer to that yet—then boredom is not wasting it. If that is true, boredom becomes win-win:</p>

<p>In the one branch of the dilemma where boredom is awesome and boredom means savoring life-as-it-is, here and now, boredom is already the winning ticket, and in the opposing branch of the dilemma where fun and busyness and jamjamjam is the ideal, boredom is still a stepping stone right into the best <em>version</em> of that richer life that helps us sift signal from noise.</p>

<p>Please don’t conflate that with that myth of how supposedly Warren Buffett at one point said “make a list of your 25 most important things, now circle your five most important ones. Done? Put the remaining twenty on an absolutely-do-not-do list.” That is fake, that doesn’t work, I’ve tried it, he never said that, I wouldn’t wanna emulate him anyway. Here, I’m not saying “step away from the 20 other appealing things in order to somehow magically receive focus and motivation and energy for the 5 best things”; instead, I’m saying that perhaps stepping <em>towards</em> some amount of boredom might give you the tools to better work with the more important things.</p>

<p>To what extent all this philosophy applies more to mainstream-headed folks and is a complete mismatch to sprawlbrains like us, that’s an unsolved question for me. It could be that this boring structure was made specifically for us and is vital lifeblood for us scatterheads whereas the plainjanes don’t need it as much, or it could be the other way around where I’m barking up the wrong tree altogether and I should try to find a more fun and entertaining toolbox to get through the day. I’m gonna keep exploring this path for a little while longer. It’s early days yet for me. And heaven knows I’m grasping at straws at this point. 😭</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-11-14T12:26:55+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/boredom"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/doomscrolling"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/doomscrolling</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/doomscrolling">The Doom That Came to Scrolling</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>“Doomscrolling” originally specifically meant scrolling through bad
news and only later was generalized to all compulsive scrolling, all
kinds of scrolling where you afterwards, when to the sessions of sweet
silent thought, summon up remembrance of things past and wonder why
the heck you spent your precious hours on the dreck you just waded
through.</p>

<p>I do think this <a href="/the-answer" title="The Answer">generalization of the word</a> has merit, that it was driven by a growing realization that it’s not just sad and overwhelming news that make us feel this bad after scrolling.
Partly because compulsive behavior almost always feel so much worse than intentional behavior but mostly because what’s out there really is depressing even if it’s the umpteenth cat video or true crimes thread.</p>

<p>But that’s not to completely discount the doomery origins of the word.
I feel guilty for how I contribute to that with my own posts since intermixed with all my charming li’l semantics and library components I want to raise awareness of urgent political issues and I often do so in a sublimated exasperation or sad rage.<small> (Because of the “slot machine effect”, the mix of glad&amp;sad might be worse than if it was all doom all day.)</small></p>

<p>I’m in a bit of a bind since I also believe that people—especially those in power—are more <em>under</em>informed about the problems than they are <em>over</em>informed.
Both are problems and lead to apathy in their own way, one through not knowing about the problem and the other by being overwhelmed by and scared of the problem, but talking to people and listening to politicians I more often get the impression that they completely underestimate the issues.</p>

<p>It’s like if a friend needs to get going with packing up by moving day.
On the one hand it’s really good to be gentle and break things down and say things like “just do <em>one</em> box today”.
On the other hand it’s not good if they believe moving day is the twentieth of May when it’s really the twentieth of March.</p>

<p>The whole reason why I keep going writing these texts, why this blog still exists<small> (it started as a place to post my paintings and some Unix advice)</small> is because I care about these political issues.</p>

<p>But I question that often, when I think about the <a href="/doomers-help" title="When the world needed doomers">doomerism</a> in doom scrolling, especially since I live my own life so filteredly, only exposing myself very few very short headlines once or twice a day and the occasional rarer deepdive into specific topics.</p>

<p>In my local circle of friends I can’t be the one who quits reading news.
In some constellations I’m the one most on top of things, in others we need to help each other keep <a href="/gullible-fox" title="Gullible like a fox">our gullibility in check</a>.
Widening the network to more faraway friends I do have a friend in Malmö who does a good job at looking out when I need to take a break from news for a few weeks.</p>

<p>But applying that mentality to the wider word is hubris.
I’m never gonna do a better job than something like <a href="https://skepticalscience.com" title="Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined">Skeptical Science</a>.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-11-13T10:11:51+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/doomscrolling"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/gullible-fox"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/gullible-fox</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/gullible-fox">Gullible like a fox</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>There is a “clever” personality type, I’ve had several in my life, that become
more susceptible to propaganda and myths when they are presented as
some kind of secret insider knowledge or a way to get a leg up on what
the general public knows.</p>

<p>Like our climate discussion group in my old hometown fell apart when
one of the more driving members suddenly switched overnight to the
“well actually it’s not gonna be a problem because peak oil is coming
soon and that’s gonna be a bigger problem” myth. That was 20 years ago
and no, climate change by far was the way bigger driver of calamities
during those two decades. Keeeping his focus on that would’ve been
much more important and saved more lives and also <a href="/solution" title="My best guess at a climate solution">the solution to
climate change</a> includes leaving it in the ground which includes
becoming less oil-dependent which also addresses peak oil
automatically whereas the peak oil hysteria didn’t come with a
solution beyond sky-is-falling hysteria fueling a carter-doctrine
style “oil interests” panic grab at immense cost in human lives.</p>

<p>When a lie is being presented as an obvious truth, it can still
fool a lot of folks. But to a certain “clever” kind of personality, a
lie that’s presented as a <em>secret</em> truth becomes much more convincing.
When it’s wrapped in “well actually” trivia. When it’s “if you
memorize this fact you’ll know something most people don’t know”, that
becomes tasty to them even when that fact is an outright lie.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-11-12T09:56:51+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/gullible-fox"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/prims-and-evans"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/prims-and-evans</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/prims-and-evans">Prims and Evans</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>Last night I dreamed that I traveled far and wide through many distant
lands. What did I see there? A scientist named Professor Meme and his
friend, who went by Joe or Jake or if it was Robert—you know how
dreams can get fuzzy—and their buddies, a couple of clown comics of
yesteryear.</p>

<p>They explained to me that “Everyone in this land is sorted into
one of two categories. Evans, who have an even number of teeth
(usually 28, 30, or 32), and Prims, who have a prime number of teeth
(usually 29 or 31).</p>

<p>Evans have higher salaries and love vanilla and comedy and yellow
clothes. Prims do all the housework and love chocolate and drama and
orange clothes.”</p>

<p>Through the life-changing magic of dreams I had been granted the super
power of “vector space analysis”<small> (which is how I knew it was a
dream because in real life I can’t do those things)</small> so I
traversed their realm and saw that yeah, for the most part, those
traits did cluster together. Usually. But there were plenty of
chocolate lovers who told me in confidence that they wouldn’t mind a
good comedy every once in a while. And the whole thing about lower
salaries turned out to be a pretty big point of contention! There were
a lot of traditionally-minded folks clad in orange who said they were
glad to do the housework, they were better at it than their
yellow-draped companion who always left the butter out anyway and
broke plates.</p>

<p>Because yes. Prims and Evans were usually paired up in constellations
of one of each. That had actually been the largest political issue of
all time just one generation ago; whether two Prims could shack up
together, or an Evan with an Evan.<small> And why always groups of
two? That’s what you get with dream logic…</small> I found a trove of
old newspaper articles that proclaimed the collapse of society if two
Evans were to partner up, and to vote for the Traditional
Constellation Party that would protect everyone from that (the same
party that incidentally also wanted to steal from the poor and give to
the rich) or the proverbial sky would fall.</p>

<p>That battle had been lost and in some areas of the land I did meet
some Orange+Orange couples and some Yellow+Yellow ones too.</p>

<p>Professor Meme and Joe/Jake/Robert didn’t seem to mind that as much as
they were fighting a “new” menace: people who didn’t neatly fit in
these two categories.</p>

<p>Actually… talking to them about it was quite confusing in that dream
way where things tend to shift and morph, because when I said that the
salary/housework thing seemed a little unfair, they said “of course!
We fight for the rights of Prims, and these reactionary category
straddlers are muddying that issue with their performative housework
and parodic chocolate-gobbling. It’s disgusting!” In all my stay in
this faraway land I never saw them actually talk about the rights of
the Prims; in fact, time and again I saw them side with factions that
wanted to constrain Prims even further, even lower salaries for Prims,
even more housework. “Don’t you see?” they said angrily. “We’re
prioritizing their right to even <em>be</em> a Prim. Isn’t that the most
fundamental of all Prim rights? And now all of a sudden it’s under
attack after being completely static throughout history.”<small> (I
actually saw in museums there that a couple of hundred years ago,
everyone was wearing orange regardless of which ice-cream flavor they
were eating. I also saw that the vanilla-eaters were all strictly
wearing velcro shoes and all the chocolate-eaters were strictly
wearing laced shoes, and I saw that when the first chocolate-eaters
had dared to put on velcros just a few decades prior, they had been
fined and jailed, but these days I saw all kinds of people—including
Professor Meme and Joe/Jake/Robert—wearing velcro shoes with
completely no reaction from anyone because it was completely normal
now. But each younger generation thinks they’re the epitome of punk
and each older generation thinks they’re the sentinels of
eternity.)</small></p>

<p>There were three kinds of people that this duo and their clown comic
hangers-on hated. The first were those who blurred the lines. A
vanilla-eater who loved drama. A comedy watcher clad in orange. This
was the worst thing. “No! No! You’ve got to stick to your tooth-given
lane!”</p>

<p>The other kind where those who sought (or provided) dental care.
Pulling of wisdom teeth, dentures, fixing cavities, repairing crowns.
People who had after dental care ended up with a different quantity
and/or quality of teeth, and reregistered as such in the National
Dentist Registry and applied for a new passport. This was also the
worst thing. Whether or not they then sought to associate with the
traits associated with their new dental parity group or not. Dental
care was called “mutilation” and “grooming” and several laws were on
the docket to outlaw it.</p>

<p>So one of the most confusing parts of the dream was how they hated the
some of the “cluster transgressors” for being too visible and they’d
yell “we can always tell”. They hated others for being too <em>in</em>visible
and they’d yell “stop confusing us, put on your orange clothes, you’re
being deceitful”. There was no winning with them. You’d think sticking
rigidly to a thin line between these two ends would’ve made them happy
but those who tried that ended up getting both kinds of hate since
those hatreds overlapped by quite a margin.</p>

<p>Looking back through the history of the land had told me that while
conflicts between the orange-clad and yellow-draped had been an issue
for ten thousand years, this latest batch of category-separation
hysteria had started out as quite a minority, an issue only a few
people had known about or cared about.<br />
That’s when they came up with their stroke of genius:<br />
Sports.</p>

<p>They brought up how in some sports like championship flossing, the
300-yard brush stroke, and pie eating contests, different teeth were
likely to perform differently, and they then generalized that to all
sports like long-distance running or Omaha hold’em. And this did
become popular! Even the emperor of the land would as a complete
non-sequitur bring up how ridiculous he thought the idea was of an
Evan participating in the Prim sports category.<small> Of course, this
emperor was a strong proponent of the
steal-from-the-poor-give-to-the-rich politics that the dental parity
traditionalists like Professor Meme and Joe/Jake/Robert had sided with
so he saw a chance to make hay while the sun shone.</small></p>

<p>And what started in sports soon extended to all facets of society.
Going to the restaurant, going to the grocery store, even going to the
powder room! Leaving your apartment in any way would induce scrutiny
and accusations and paranoia, for everyone. All for the greater good
of the Olympics!</p>

<p>This sudden sports-mania ushered in a new law: you shall be
categorized as Prim or Evan at birth. I know, I know, babies don’t
have teeth. And neither do old people. That’s just how crazy this
dream was! The doctors<small> (the few remaining doctors, since dental
care was under legal attack)</small> would just take their best guess.
And that was the parity category you would stick to for the rest of
your entire life. Problem solved easily and perfectly.</p>

<p>That created a third kind of people for our diligent duo to hate on.
For example, there was a boxer… or maybe it was a runner. The doctors
had categorized them as Prim at birth. Which they were happy with.
They loved orange. They loved chocolate. They loved drama. All was
well. Until they won. Didn’t their mouth look kind of even on TV?
Something about the cheeks, the way they moved… an invasive dental
counting procedure was promptly ordered and it turned out they had… I
forget if they had two teeth (both prime and even) or 27 teeth
(neither prime nor even) but out came the hate, long before the
mouthcount. That’s how it was in this land. They hate you if you
transgress your medically assigned dental parity cluster and they hate
you if you stick to it. They hated everyone until there was no-one left
and darkness and decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion
over all.</p>

<p>You see, they were <span style="letter-spacing: +2ex">scientific</span> and <span style="letter-spacing: +2ex">rational</span>.</p>

<p>And in their rationality and science-mindedness, they had come up with
all manners of slags and mocking names to apply to everyone who didn’t
stick to their lane. “Oh, so you’re stick-to-your-laners?” I asked,
and they boiled over with anger. “How dare you utter such a <em>slur</em>?!”
they screamed, “We’re just <em>normal people</em>!”</p>

<p>After a few years of this, they came up with the term
“cluster-critical” for themselves. I thought that didn’t make any
sense. Weren’t they the ones who were more strongly than anyone else
trying to really enshrine these societal clusters of traits into two
immutable granite-carved groups, and erase all outliers and
overlappers? How is that being cluster-critical? They slapped me with
a splintered ruler and said “You dolt! You clod!” and explained that
the whole idea of speaking more generally about the two groups as
being mere “clusters of traits” was “propaganda of the cluster movement”
which they opposed, which they saw as denying the biological tooth of
dental parity, denying how almost everyone has either an even amount
of teeth or a prime amount of teeth. How that’s a natural fact.<small>
(Question marks on how that 27-denying factoid, even if it had been
true, would apply to ice cream flavors, clothes color, or TV
genres.)</small></p>

<p>I asked them if is this what they spent all their time fighting about?
What about climate change? It has already killed millions of people.
They just looked at me stubbornly, and started to explain, once more,
from the top, something about the delicate flavors of vanilla.</p>

<p>You would think that in this land, everything would’ve been
teeth-forward. Everything would’ve been all teeth teeth teeth on
billboards and t-shirts and mugs. But actually no. Teeth were a very
private thing and had been so throughout the ages. Ogling teeth was
considered vulgar, and was sometimes done in an exploitative way.
You’d see a poster with teeth in a workshop or a pair of rubber dentures
hanging off the back of a truck, for shock value, but normally people
covered their mouths when they ate. When a movie scene featured bare
teeth, usually a “tooth stunt double” subbed in for the actor, or
dentures were worn. Asking each other about their teeth was a big
taboo.</p>

<p>Under a mossy stone in the deep, dark wood, I found a file showing
that before they came up with this teeth-counting business, they had
been counting people’s nose hairs. Everything had been all about the
nose hairs. Until they discovered that the teeth thing had a three
percent stronger correlation with the socially created cluster roles.</p>

<p>So if you’ve ever wondered why some wear yellow and others wear
orange, now you know.</p>

        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-11-09T10:14:11+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/prims-and-evans"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/unplug-weirdo"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/unplug-weirdo</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/unplug-weirdo">Being an unplug weirdo to not be a FOSS weirdo</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>I’ve retraced my steps trying to remember how I became such a screentime hater. It started with me <a href="/franklin" title="Franklin Street Statement on Freedom and Network Services">not wanting to be on board with Facebook or other proprietary apps</a>. But after a few years years of this I got so sick of being a FOSS weirdo which no-one could understand or respect or see why it was important or mattered. Like people hate, really super duper hate on vegans but at least they understand what it is.</p>

<p>I think that’s why I wanted to unplug entirely instead. Somehow people understand ludditism waaay more than they understand GNU slash Lin slash ux or “I don’t have Google System Frameworks” or why I can’t open their doc files or whatever. That, they can’t get, but someone showing up with a dumbphone, that makes more sense.</p>

<p>But sooner than I would’ve thought, I internalized this ludditism and it became part of my identity, it became one of my things<small> or at least aspirationally—I get sucked into online rabbit holes every now and then, like everyone else</small>. To the extent that I often almost forget where it started.</p>

<p>I crawled back online after a few months of pandemic isolation and “joined socials” IRC at first, then Gemini and Fedi two months later. I had been on hobby forums all along like Story Games, BGG, or WRNU.</p>

<p>And it was great at first (and I got talked into <a href="/i-miss-foss" title="I stopped sticking to FOSS but immediately regretted that decision">ending my 22 year long streak of being FOSS-only</a>, via an awful iPad) but then I got into my head that my health issues was exarcebated by screens after I took a couple of <a href="/digital-detox" title="Digital detox">digital detox</a> vacays and really enjoyed them and felt really healthy and serene. Going back on and off different kinds of screens I’ve found that some health problems do seem to correlate and others not at all. I got really really sick December 2021 and stayed sick for many many months.</p>

<p>Maybe I won’t ever be able to sustainably capture the “offline mindset” in my day-to-day and I’ll always just succumb to procrastination and temptation but I dunno. Gonna keep pushing on just a little bit longer.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-11-03T23:02:14+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/unplug-weirdo"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/traffic-lights"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/traffic-lights</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/traffic-lights">Stockholm Traffic Lights</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>In Stockholm, traffic lights have a push button that pedestrians are supposed to press when they cross and all the type A personalities that’d press the button even when it had already been pressed and lit up used to bug me, an annoyance that persisted in me for maybe six months or so after I found out that no, it doesn’t “reset” the pushing and we don’t have to wait longer. It’s just a redundant, safely idempotent extra press for no benefit or effect. It’s fine.</p>

<p>These days I have the opposite problem: people who don’t press at all, even when it’s unlit! Almost no-one seems to know that they need to actually press the traffic light button!</p>

<p>While a lot of this is due to people being distracted phone addicts and I’ve seen again and again someone arriving at a traffic light, not pressing the button but instead immediately whipping out their phone and then keeping it up from then on even as they absentmindedly cross the street.</p>

<p>But I have two other stories about this both from within the past three days and neither involved phones for the most part. First, there’s this one crossing where there’s roadwork being done so one side of the street have a metal bridge to safely walk on but they cannot reach the push button and I walked from that direction. I had no way to reach the button. On the other side of the street two women arrived; the one nearest the button had a dog in a leash and a paper tote but could reasonably easily have pushed the button. After a while even more people arrived<small> (some of these latter arrivals were phone zombies, breaking the theme of this essay, which is about the more general trend of absentminded lack of awareness even when phones are away)</small> and they weren’t carrying anything at all. I tried gesturing to them to push the button but they didn’t. They stood and waited for a while without pushing the button and after a while they just started crossing the street jaywalkingly, even though the light still said don’t walk. So I gave up and do the same. And of course <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy's_law" title="Murphy’s Law">Murphy</a> being a 🐝, that’s when cars wanted to turn in on that there and almost hit us. Because of the construction the sidewalk was way closer to the cars than normal so using the traffic light was even more important than usual. I was so salty that they just didn’t press.</p>

<p>Later that same evening at another intersection on the same busy street two men in their fifties were walking ahead of me; along the same street as me just ahead so they arrived at the traffic lights first. They decided to just cross the street immediately without pushing no sissy “traffic light button” but after just a few step as cars roar by they reconsidered and stepped back. And they didn’t press the button. They just stood there until I caught up and could press the button. It eventually turned green and we all could cross. We could’ve crossed way sooner if they had just pressed the button and then it would’ve been green by the time I got there. <a href="/sitting" title="Sitting">Patience? Yeah, yeah… how long will that take?</a></p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-11-01T22:57:37+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/traffic-lights"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/25-years-cloister"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/25-years-cloister</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/25-years-cloister">25 years of cloister life</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>I saw a docu about a nun who’d spent 25 years in a Carmel cloister. Which for Sweden is unusual. Obv I was fishing for info about digital minimalism but the docu didn’t deliver what I wanted in that regard. She says at one point “We don’t have radio, TV, or newspapers, and we use internet very sparingly”. I was like “Internet?! Deets please! Exactly how many times a day do you refresh Antenna or sync your newsgroups? What’s your IRC bouncer, how’s your milter pipeline?” to no avail.</p>

<p>And while for her that’s a 25-years-and-counting journey, for the lady next to me in the theatre even the 100 min runtime was too long to forgo checking socials apparently. I don’t blame her; that’s just a sign of how addictive these apps actually are.<small> (Okay, I do blame her a little but I try not to.)</small></p>

<p>So while the movie was slim pickings for my monomaniacal obsession with offline living<small> (which for me has become increasingly theoretical since I got tablets to suck me back online after <a href="/dumbphone-experience" title="The Dumbphone Experience">switching to dumbphone</a> eight years ago)</small>, the devotional side of it was more rewarding. I love “The Interior Castle” and have read it a couple of times. But at the same time these are the folks<small> (and her fam def belonged to the most reactionary faction)</small> that fight against reproductive autonomy and affirming care—not just for themselves but in legislative chambers around the world. That subtext stayed sub, glossed over, unexamined in this film. Overall a worthwhile watch if you can complement it with your own political awareness and ability to recognize efforts to bind the outgroup.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-10-30T16:49:40+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/25-years-cloister"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/path"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/path</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/path">The thorny path to goodness</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>Virtue signaling is great actually.</p>

<p>Clearly communicating our values can prevent a lot of grief and help
stand up for what’s right.</p>

<p>Early on before I started writing more explicitly about politics I got a couple of “I love your blog but why don’t you write more about the supremacy of the Aryan Race?” and I’m like oh no, down the line something went wrong and I’d better make it more clear how I feel about the world and why. Everyone is welcome to read and since I have a lot of opinions on everything, <a href="/one-eighties" title="180s">some of them wrong</a>, I don’t expect anyone to agree on everything but if I can make someone <a href="/debate" title="Debate">see the world a li’l differently</a> that’s great.</p>

<p>In discourse lately I’m seeing a gap where on the one hand we have
straight up apology for evil, excuses for abuse, for sexism, for
racism, and DARVO attacks on “woke” and on “virtue signaling”. On the
opposing hand we have self-proclaimed saints who have never (or at
least never since they proverbially woke up) had a kyriarchal or jealous or
problematic thought or notion. And when these saints fall they fall
very far and very fast.</p>

<p>What’s missing is a way to cultivate awareness
of our shortcomings and in order to better ourselves. I’d trust “I
sometimes have racist thoughts that I try to catch and see through and
examine and not get fooled by” over either “I’ve never been
problematic (or I haven’t since I became a born-again intersectional
feminist)” or, worse, “here’s a 39 chapter book on why racism is good
actually and anything else is virtue signaling woketry”.</p>

<p>The former <a href="/politics" title="Politics">camp</a>,
<a href="/how-to-woke" title="How to become OK with woke">intersectional social justice</a>, y’all know I love you and this isn’t a
slag on you but what I wanna add to that worldview is a bit of
solution-orientedness and <a href="/sitting" title="Sitting">awareness practice</a>. I have thought, said,
and even done things I would wanna cancel myself over but treating
each other right is a process.</p>

<p>I think this one example of this that’s easy to understand just for how ridiculous it is, is how sometimes new vegans can forget how up until three months ago they themselves were among the meat-eaters they now attack.</p>

<p>We’ve all been there, so I don’t blame them, it’s just illustrative of how sometimes it’s so easy to see the motes in our fellow humans’ eyes while we ourselves are so deep in timberland we don’t even notice the forest.</p>

<p>That’s not an apology for bad things; it’s a reveille against bad things, against the bad things in us all.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-10-06T11:12:50+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/path"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/our_hardearned_dystopia"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/our_hardearned_dystopia</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/our_hardearned_dystopia">Our hard-earned dystopia</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>People hated meetings and phone calls and even answering machines so
our current world of short text messages is one we strived for years
in order to finally build.</p>

<p>People hated reading books, too, that was for eggheads and nerds. So
boring. And even watching TV was boring. Even after they made 500
channels the meme was “500 channels and nothing good on”. So today’s
world of tailor-made, algorithmic For You pages is a godsend by our
corporate overlords.</p>

<p>We have finally built the perfect life and I hate it.</p>

<p>Of course I hadn’t really planned on all this infrastructure becoming
co-opted by a handful of corporations <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/network-freedom-act" title="Network Freedom Act">quickly becoming the richest in the world</a> nor that our newfould decentralized politically liberated media would immediately get gunked up by a
 bunch of nazis and climate denialists.</p>

<p>I had a hard time getting along with the people around me (still do)
so for me the digital world was a paradise. All positive. It wasn’t
until Facebook won the internet that I wanted out. And heaven knows
that I want out. I’ve been fighting to get out for a long time. First
of October was my eight year anniversary <a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/dumbphone-experience" title="The Dumbphone Experience">without smart phone</a>. A
decade prior to that I spent one year without internet at home, only
at work (and that, 2007, was before I got smartphone, which I got in
fall of 2009 and had for eight years until fall of 2017).</p>

<p>As I rail against The Internet, I have to remind myself that people
wanted it. <strong>I wanted it.</strong> Yes, I didn’t want the Meta-owned
Google-goopy AppStore-locked prison toy internet full of brownshirted
redcaps but I shoulda coulda woulda seen the writing on the wall. The
<a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/network-externalities" title="Network externalities">network effect</a> is a helluva drug.</p>

<p>But… now we have options? We have Fedi, we have Gemini, we still
have e-mail, we even have Jitsi and XMPP and IRC (kind of). We have
Marginalia and XXIIVV and The Internet Phonebook.</p>

<p>Why do I still want out? Can’t I just shake this hangup and keep on
rocking on the free net? Yeah, maybe! It’s just that: I’m not happy
with where I am in life and I am trying to make changes. And I’ve been
trying for a very long time now. More than two decades. Where I’ll end
up after those changes, I don’t know. In the grave, most likely, with
the battle unfinished and unwon. One day at a time, my friends.♥︎</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-10-04T12:50:16+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/our_hardearned_dystopia"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/teach-and-learn"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/teach-and-learn</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/teach-and-learn">Teach and learn beats RTFM</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>A friend of mine has that same attitude and it always bug me because
if me and him woulda read one book each and then teach each other what
we learned, that would’ve a lot of the time end up saving both of us
time, and we would’ve learned things <em>better</em> and being able to bounch
ideas off each other and help explain things. Even more so if we were
three people who read one book each and taught each other as opposed
to reading three books each.</p>

<p>That’s actually one of my biggest regrets in life. That I didn’t have
enough of a community to learn from and teach. Trying to learn art for
example, and programming, was insanely hard. For art I was on my own,
for programming everyone was so freaking macho that we weren’t really
teaching each other (and when we started doing it just a little,
things got better not worse). Same goes for roleplaying with that
awful cult of GM secrecy in the nineties making sure everyone stunk at
GM:ing and no-one getting better. And making music? There I did have a
lot of people to learn with and ask and answer to and lo and behold I
got a lot better at that a lot quicker than the toughing-it-out-alone
type skills.</p>

<p>And when I belatedly hopped online due to pandemic-induced loneliness
in 2020 even at the old dog trick age of 40 I rapidly learned more at
a greater rate than I had ever done before and I hope others have been
able to learn from me also.</p>

<p>So while a curious mind and as stack of man pages can go far, a group
of curious minds working together can go even further.♥︎</p>

        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-08-19T23:17:31+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/teach-and-learn"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/sds-maltavla"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/sds-maltavla</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/sds-maltavla">SDs nya måltavla</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>SD, Sveriges största nazistparti, kort efter ha blivit klara med sin “vitbok” som ska “göra upp” med deras rasistiska “förflutna” har letat länge efter en grupp dom kan ha som hackkyckling enligt fascismens centrala paroll att flytta samhällets konfliktlinje från att inte längre handla om arbetare mot ägare och istället handla om vi normala mot dom där andra, hittat en ny måltavla och den är perfekt för dom som ju helst vill att syndabocksgruppen ska gå att framställa som patetisk och vämjelig samtidigt som den kan målas upp som jättestark och mäktig och krallig och farlig och det största hotet nånsin mot verklighetens sunda normala lingonsyltsfolk. Tyvärr är den inte särskilt orginell utan dom har snott den från <abbr title="Make America Great Again, USAs fasciströrelse">MAGA</abbr> som efter att ha gett sig på <abbr title="Hillary Rodham Clinton, en ärligt talat rätt dålig politiker men Trump är ännu dåligare">HRC</abbr>, <abbr title="Black Lives Matter, en självklarhet enligt mig, en katastrof enligt nassarna">BLM</abbr>, och <abbr title="Critical Race Theory, dvs att säga sanningen att USA hade slavar och att det var dåligt">CRT</abbr> till sist riktade in sig på sitt gamla favoritmobboffer HBT:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>SD vill riva upp könstillhörighetslagen, avbryta satsningar på genus i förskolan och utreda frågan om att ge ersättning till dem som blivit felbehandlade för könsdysfori.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Ja det fatt’ man ju. Är nästan mer förvånad att det har tagit dom så här lång tid att komma ihåg att det fanns rosa trianglar också och inte bara gula stjärnor.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>SD-toppar skriver i en debattartikel i Svenska Dagbladet att lagen som ska göra det lättare att byta juridiskt kön både är ogenomtänkt och skadlig.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Lite pinigt för Svenska Dagbladet att dom lämnar utrymme för BSS att publicera sina skabrösa pamfletter. Är mer förvånad över det än att nassarna hackar på queera.</p>

<p>En sak som är svår att förstå även för oss som försöker vara allierade med T om vi inte läser på lite i typ fem sekunder vilket kanske är mer än vad brunskjortegrobianerna klarar av, det är att trans har blivit en större paraplybegrepp som innefattar massor av saker som förut varit separata. CW gammspråk som många numera förkastar: Det fanns liksom “transvestit” och “transsexuell” och “fluid” och “flexible” och nu har många av dom joined forces och gjort gemensam sak. Men i den gemensamma saken ingår att alla inte vill samma saker. En del vill inte operera sig eller ta medicin och då tycker jag att det bra att det inte ska vara obligatoriskt längre. En bra förändring. Medan en del verkligen vill det och då tycker jag det är viktigt att det ska fortsätta vara tillgängligt. Något att värna.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>De hävdar att man under de senaste åren kunnat se en »explosionsartad ökning« av ungdomar som vill genomgå ett könsbyte</p>
</blockquote>

<aside>(Tack, SVT text, för att ni satte scare quotes på SDs goja: »explosionsartad ökning«)</aside>

<p>Från transaktivister har jag sett ett jättebra motargument här som handlar om att när vänsterhänthet gradvis slutade vara tabu så ökade det drastiskt. Sen stannade det på ungefär 11% (eller det är snarare så här: 22% av befolkningen har den hjärnlateraliseringen som gör att det är 50/50 vilken hänthet dom får, 78% har den som gör att man blir högerhänt). Tycker om det argumentet och vidarebefodrar det gärna och sätter det dessutom först för jag tycker det är det bästa.</p>

<p>Jag har två andra också, se dom som komplement till vänsterhäntsgrejen snarare än nåt som ska underminera den. Speciellt det första av dom är snarare en variant av vänsterhäntsgrejen:</p>

<p>Som jag skrev innan så har trans blivit ett bredare paraplybegrepp och
det betyder också att det verkar som en ökning. Det som förut bara var
en väldigt specifik skärva under paraplyt är nu ett strå bland många i
en större bukett. Då kommer det absolut se ut som det är mer, mycket mer. Och jag tycker det är rimligt. Alla ungdomar som vill byta pronomen vill inte nödvändigtvis ha både mediciner och operationer. Precis som alla som tog hål i örat på 90-talet inte nödvändigtvis kom nästa dag med hålsmycken i näsan, ögonbrynen, kinderna, och tungan.<small> (En hel del gjorde det så misstolka inte det här som en diss mot dom som gjorde det. Försöker bara förklara att folk är olika.)</small></p>

<p>Pronomen förresten… Det är så orättvist att det som började som en otroligt generös och självuppoffrande eftergift från trans till oss andra, det som kändes liksom som att dom när dom lyfte pronomenfrågan sa “om ni nu verkligen vägrar se oss som det kön vi säger att vi är, kan ni då åtminstone använda rätt pronomen? Säg ‘han’ om transmän, ‘hon’ om transkvinnor, och så vidare för dom andra mer ickebinära varianterna. Om det som ni kallar oss åtminstone är schysst så kan ni sen tänka och tycka och tro vad ni vill inne i era egna huven. På så sätt kan vi leva tillsammans. Vanligt hyfs for the win”, till och med det lilla har blivit en enorm hatvektor för grobianerna att driva med, vägra, och tjafsa mot. Precis som när generationen innan inte längre vågade säga att dom <em>var</em> det könet dom sa dom var, utan som kompromiss började säga att dom “identifierar sig” som det, trots att också det på sin tid var en jätteeftergift så blev det uttrycket “identifierar” nåt som varenda clown comic började ha som garvmotor och spotthink. Trots att det bara var transpersonernas sätt att försöka vara schyssta! En olivkvist från dom, <a href="/zone-of-suck" title="The Zone of Suck">en kompromiss</a> med oss cis. Till och med den kvisten ville transfoberna kvadda och håna.</p>

<p>Det andra argumentet kanske kan verka motsäga vänsterhäntsgrejen lite men tänk
efter så kan dom ändå vara komplement till varandra. Det kanske är en
faktisk ökning också: En av dom coolaste teorierna till varför en del
blir trans är att det är en epigenetisk förändring dvs det är nåt som
händer innan dom ens fötts. (Enligt den teorin är det alltså inte bara
en modegrej eller inbillning.) Epigenetiska förändringar kan ha
trender dvs dom kan öka och minska. Kanske är det miljöföroreningar
som har slagit till? Synd då att högern är väldigt ointresserade av
att städa upp miljön.</p>

<p>Hoppsan, Kerstin! Nu höll jag och kanske en hel del av er läsare på att ramla rakt i deras fälla och diskutera frågan på deras premisser (“den explosionsartade ökningen”). Då är det viktigt att komma ihåg att <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gender_movement" title="Anti-gender movement - Wikipedia">hatkampanjen mot trans</a> är väldigt avsiktlig och manipulativ från fascisternas sida och den <strong>hatkampanjen började tidigt åttiotal, långt innan “ökningen”</strong>. Det var inte transpersonerna som gjorde toafrågan till en fråga, det var hatkampanjerna som först lyfte det.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>men att det ofta ligger psykiatriska sjukdomar bakom dysforin</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Nu ska alla känsliga transpersoner sluta läsa, you know I love you men stålsätt er för det kommer handla om att vara koko på andra sätt:</p>

<p>Att det är väldigt vanligt att psykiatriska och neuropsykiatriska tillstånd förekommer samtidigt tror jag också. Kan visserligen vara för att jag bara känner nördar så därför är dom transmän och transkvinnor och ickebinäris jag känner också väldigt nördiga och, hmm, “spektrala”, men det finns också studier som tyder på det att det förekommer ett visst mått av sammanfallande. Inte alla men fler än vanligt. Men det betyder inte att det har orsakat att dom “inbillar sig” att dom är trans. Dels kan det kanske vara snarare tvärt om, att det deras transhjärnor också orsakar annat för det verkar ju vara rätt jobbigt och till och med traumatiskt att vara trans<small> (ffa pga alla transfober)</small>. Ännu troligare om nu den epigenetiska teorin stämmer är att det finns en gemensam orsak. Nåt skummo händer med deras små gener och det gör att dom blir det ena och att dom blir det andra.</p>

<p>Oavsett orsak så är bästa vårdplanen enligt WPATH rätt väl befäst: ge dom den vård dom själva väljer. Om en mentalsjuk person har ett brutet ben så förtjänar dom lika mycket gips som en mentalt odiagnostiserad person! Oavsett hur det nu kom sig att dom bröt benet.</p>

<p>Det har nu till och med blivit så i Sverige att i vissa fall pausas könsutredningen när dom misstänker att patienten har autism. “Kanske det bara är autism istället.” Med tanke på hur många transpersoner som också har autism så blir det där lilla “istället” vansinnigt och feltänkt.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>eller att den upphör efter puberteten.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rätt ovetenskapligt som vanligt från SD eftersom det ändå är bara ett fåtal som ångrar sig. Och att det finns är ju bara ännu ett argument för att som Madonna så klokt sa det en gång i tiden: express yourself, don’t repress yourself!</p>

<p>Antitransrörelsen är också uppbyggd kring några totala paradoxer värre än klyftan i Mattisborgen:</p>

<p>Det första är dubbelbestraffningen. Dom hatar dom som transitionerar för mycket och tar mediciner och operationer. Medicinsk vård vill dom försvåra. Samtidigt hatar dom precis lika mycket dom som transitionerar <strong>för lite</strong> och bara vill byta pronomen och namn och kanske ha en söt sjal eller <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trousers_as_women%27s_clothing" title="Trousers as women's clothing - Wikipedia">ett par gedigna jeans</a>. Den typen av mer sociala förändringar vill dom också försvåra.</p>

<p>Den andra gäller inte SD för dom hatar all feminism men det är könsrollerna. Den såkallade könskritiska “feminismen”<small> (sätter scare quotes kring terfarnas “feminism” eftersom jag tänker att riktig feminism vill intersektionellt riva ner kyriarkatet och då är queerhet nåt coolt som hjälper oss att göra det)</small> är ett helt nystan av absurda paradoxer där deras gränsvaktande av könsrollernra på nåt sätt ska motverka könsrollerna enligt dom. Dom har dessutom inget konsekvent program utan ta ex vis frågan om transmän (dvs AFAB) ska gå på herrtoan (som dom själva vill) eller på damtoan (som transfobernas egna lagar numera säger). Alla säger dom svaret är självklart men en del säger det ena, andra säger det andra, och många säger varken att dom inte är välkomna nånstans. Sen ja jo ju mer tiden går och dom inom sekten hinner läsa vararandras memer så kommer dom enas mer och mer. Slutsats: då var det ju inte så “självklart” som dom sa först!</p>

<p>Det gemensamma för allt det här är att det går inte att göra “rätt” för att blidka dom. Det dom <em>egentligen</em> vill är att transpersoner inte ska finnas <strong>alls</strong>, inte att dom ska “göra rätt” och “transitionera lagom”. Eller det dom egentligen <strong>egentligen</strong> vill bakom allt är att dom ska kunna fortsätta mobba dom för all framtid, mobba dom hela vägen till banken. Åttiotalets “skatt är stöld, frihandel är bra” är helt ute. Det nygamla avdammade från trettiotalet är “rösta på dom rika för dom kommer skydda er mot fjollorna”.</p>

<p>Slutsats: trans liberation now!</p>

<aside>Note for anglophones translating this text: In English it’s polite and good to add a space making “trans man” a two word noun phrase with an adjectivized qualifier on a validating head phrase, and the same goes for “trans woman”, since AGAB doesn’t make you less of what you really are. Swedish noun phrases don’t work that way so please take care that I didn’t mean the disparaging form that your translator app might have put in. Also please don’t bite my head off around the mental health stuff. I’m not saying every single one of y’all are dealing with different stuff. I am saying there’s all kinds of folks out there and even the ones dealing with different stuff are legit.♥︎  Keep on reaching for that rainbow♥︎</aside>

<h2 id="ps">PS</h2>

<p>SD är som vanligt noggranna med att skriva sitt hat så det låter som omsorg. Dom hakar på MAGAs hatkampanj utan att säga samma saker rätt ut. Så det kommer säkert verka som att dom kan säga “men vi sa ju faktiskt inte så”. Aha bra så vår intersektionella queerfeminism är alltså toppen för alla! Jolly good i så fall! Och lägg i så fall genast ner er kampanj mot den nya könstillhörighetslagen osv.</p>

        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-06-30T10:26:12+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/sds-maltavla"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/offentlig-reklam"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/offentlig-reklam</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/offentlig-reklam">Bort med offentlig reklam</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>Kan vi inte drastiskt skära ner på reklamen i det offentliga rummet så som dom stora plancherna i busskurer och dom vidriga tevesskärmarna i tunnelbanan nu när dom som vill ha reklam har det sina fickapparater? Snälla 😭 vi kunde bli så lyckliga i en stad som är mer vacker, levande, harmonisk, och inte hela tiden dränkt av köphets och stress och slitochsläng och trender. <a href="https://principiadiscordia.com/book/45.php" title="A Sermon on Ethics and Love">Dom som tycker om reklamen</a> kan ju få det när dom vill genom att bara stoppa handen i fickan och dra fram den oändliga historien av prylar &amp; stilar &amp; dealar medan vi griniga åttiotalstanter kan dra en lättnadens suck. Klimatkrisen går ändå inte att shoppa bort så låt åtminstone vårt gemensamma blickfält slippa sponsra tillväxtlämmeltågets speedrun mot det slipade svärdet. 💸🗡️</p>

<p>När jag var liten var det olagligt att sända reklam på radion och teven. Att folk kunde stänga av eller kolla på andra kanaler ändrade inte det.</p>

<p>Nu är det istället obligatoriskt att kolla på det. På reklamteveapparaterna vid busshållsplatsen. Apparater som är tre gånger större än den största teven jag nånsin sett. Trots att folk har reklammottagare i fickan. Miniapparater som också är obligatoriska för att få kontakt med sjukvård och bostad och bank.</p>

<p>För vi lever i en sjuk värld. En värld jag inte vill vara i.</p>

<p>På [fulinternet tycker folk att det ska vara mer reklam istället]<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/stockholm/comments/129dfuq/jag_skulle_v%C3%A4ldigt_g%C3%A4rna_vilja_se_ett_totalf%C3%B6rbud/">ftfadsvmri</a>.</p>

<p>Ett mikroekonomiskt perspektiv som inte ser samhällsbyggarskogen för alla transaktionsträd. “Jag skulle vilja sluta rök–” “Nej jag vill ha konstanta cigaretter istället för då skulle jag inte behöva tändare bara kunna tända nästa på förra ciggens fimp!”</p>

<p>Reklam är inte gratis resurser. Tvärt om. Det går åt tid och jobb och resurser att sätta upp och byta ut dom där skyltarna och tavlorna och att producera dom där filmerna och jinglarna. Det är knegare som tvingas göra det (för att få mat och tak). Och dom som blir rika är annonsbolagen och annonsörerna.</p>

        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-06-29T21:56:02+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/offentlig-reklam"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/misunderstood"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/misunderstood</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/misunderstood">Please don’t let me be misunderstood</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>People cancel each other for one of two things, right? Either they’re suspected of having done something bad, something they’re denying but the allegations are credible. Or, and this is so starkly different: they are pundits baldfacedly spouting evil. They’re using their platform and their megaphone to stoke the flames of hate and persecution and oppression. They’re not denying it, they’re <em>proud</em> of it. We can’t treat these two things the same.</p>

<p>But from that second in the garden, we humans were all cursed with foot-in-mouth disease. People say misunderstandable things or there’s hearsay or there’s “can you believe they allegedly said such-and-such (or so I’ve been told)”.</p>

<p>These categories aren’t clear cut. I’ve seen people be canceled for supposedly having said the opposite of what they are really saying and fighting for, while the most vile demagogues manage to slither away with dog whistles and transparent “I’ve just got a few concerns” slogans.</p>

<p>So being a thinking human being isn’t easy. There is no silver bullet and we always have to case-by-case it. And it’s only with the full awareness of how we’re condemned to case-by-casing it and our lack of a universal solution that I put forth the following rule of thumb that works <em>sometimes</em>:</p>

<p>Argue for or against the idea rather than <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem" title="Ad hominem - Wikipedia">against the person</a>. That’s <a href="/free-speech" title="Free Speech">not to say that every idea should be debatable</a> in some cacophonous “marketplace” of random junk. See, this is what I didn’t want. Overstating things.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-06-15T17:40:45+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/misunderstood"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/iorist"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/iorist</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/iorist">Iorist ethics</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>I believe good intentions IOR good results is okay.
I’m calling it iorist ethics. Ior for the logical gate of inclusive or, and, it’s an initialism for intentions or results.</p>

<p>Consequentialists are like:<br />
Good ints, good rez: 👍🏻<br />
Good ints, bad rez: 🚫<br />
Bad ints, good rez: 👍🏻<br />
Bad ints, bad rez: 🚫</p>

<p>And deontologists are like:<br />
Good ints, good rez: 👍🏻<br />
Good ints, bad rez: 👍🏻<br />
Bad ints, good rez: 🚫<br />
Bad ints, bad rez: 🚫</p>

<p>But I’m like:<br />
Good ints, good rez: 👍🏻<br />
Good ints, bad rez: 👍🏻<br />
Bad ints, good rez: 👍🏻<br />
Bad ints, bad rez: 🚫</p>

<p>The bar for evil gets really high because you need to both mean ill and do ill. The world’s nastiest actual cannibal if he fails at eating you and ends up saving you? Complete hero, gets a medal on Yavin.</p>

<p>Now, don’t worry: even if you actually are evil by meaning ill and doing ill, like you’re acting selfishly and duplicitously in a way that hurts others, there’s still a way back through forgiveness. You can become good and stop being evil. Don’t misinterpret that as an out to deliberately keep being evil knowing there’s forgiveness waiting for you. Instead be inspired by the forgiveness and change your ways immediately! Or stay good if you’re already good.</p>

<p>Now, just like consequentialism and deontologism, what actions actually count as <a href="/good-or-bad" title="Good or Bad">good or bad</a>, just and unjust, fair and unfair, cool or dorky is another question entirely. This is just about what “layer” the ethics operate on. Whether good intentions really pave the road to hell or if they’re cool actually even if you accidentally mess up.</p>

<h2 id="existentialist-ethics">Existentialist ethics?</h2>

<p>But Sandra, haven’t you pledged allegiance to existentialist ethics
before? Yup! Like deontologists, they are all about intentions; unlike
deontologists (who are rules-based), the existentialists are all about using your own head &amp; heart and
case-by-casing it. I still love that approach over consequentialism.
I’m just adding some celebration for the accidental heroes who mean
ill but end up doing good by mistake.</p>

        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-05-12T12:03:58+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/iorist"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/hje"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/hje</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/hje">Hockey Jersey Ethics</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>It’s an open question in philosophy <a href="/means-vs-ends" title="Means vs Ends">to what extent ends justify means</a>.</p>

<p>In the twisted world of “Hockey Jersey Ethics”, the <em>team</em> justifies
the means. This mentality acts as if no act is too evil if it’s done
by your own team. Stopping and asking if <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h242eDB84zY" title="“Are We the Baddies?” — That Mitchell and Webb Look - YouTube">we’re the baddies</a> is
derided as a lack of team spirit. “Good” they define by who’s doing
it, not what they’re doing. The end goal? They lost track of that a
long time ago. It’s forgotten.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-04-27T08:46:51+02:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/hje"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/two-wolves"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/two-wolves</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/two-wolves">The Two Wolves</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>Inside of me there are two wolves. One is called “I ought to” and the
other is called “I don’t wanna”.</p>

<p><img src="/moon-moon.jpg" alt="Kinda like this photo meme of an unruly wolf." /></p>

<p>Sometimes it’s “I ought to” running the internal monologue, the
“school speakers in my brain” so to speak, and verbalizes things that
I ought to do and gets frustrated and surprised that they do not get
done.</p>

<p>Other times it’s “I don’t wanna” that’s set out to rest and calm the
heck down but can’t because there’s a gnawing guilt.</p>

<p>So it’s not that one is always “the conscious” and the other is always
“the subconscious”. That can change.<small> (I know calling it
“sub”-conscious has fallen out of vogue in psychology but I wanna
bring it back, I do think it’s a great name for it, bubbling juuuust
under the surface, you can barely feel it out.)</small> But they’re
both in control; they equally affect what I actually <em>do</em>.</p>

<p>Belatedly discovering this phenomenon in the mid 00s was a huge step
forward for me. It was something I wish I had understood much
earlier.<small> (The first 25 years I lived on this planet I had
severe procrastination issues. That’s why I write so much about
that.)</small></p>

<p>At first, I didn’t understand that they could switch places. I thought
“I” <em>was</em> “I ought to”, and that I was wrestling with the laziest
angel of all time. But even that level of awareness of the other wolf
was a good step forward.</p>

<p>I couldn’t “hear” it yet but I could try to deduce from how it
influenced my actions and inactions what it really wanted and try to
comprommise with it, or be clear to it, or just validate it.</p>

<p>In that era, a powerful technique when it was really hard to do
something and I just didn’t know why I’m procrasting so much was to
sit down and let wash over me the thought of how much of a hecking
schlep the task is going to be, really fully feel how much I don’t
wanna do it. A lot of the time, after doing that, I’ll feel myself
rise from the chair and go do it.</p>

<p>That was “I don’t wanna” feeling fully heard and validated, and
wordlessly being like “Damn, sis! That was all you had to say! I was
worried you weren’t hearing me and that you weren’t taking into
consideration my warning that this was going to be a huge pain in the
neck!”</p>

<p>I came to see “I don’t wanna” less as an impish monkey on my back and
more like a cute monchhichi I needed to take care of, make sure it was
heard, acknowledged, taken into consideration. “I” still was “I ought
to”, or so it seemed, but I tried hard to not overextend myself, to
get rest in, to add food and sleep to the mix in with “I ought to”’s
desire to hack the world and write The Great Pan-Galactic Novel.</p>

<p>Mid ’10s, I found out about how psychologist and roshi Marsha Linehan
uses two Euler circles for what I’m calling two “wolves” here; and for
actions and inactions that the two can agree on, things that are in
the intersection of her two “circles”, she calls that the “wise mind”.</p>

<p>By then I had just about figured out how it’s not always the
procrastinating, inactive side that’s lurking under the surface. That
the two wolves can and do switch who’s on the mic. To no avail because
what we tell ourselves
what we’ll do <a href="https://angryflower.com/296.html" title="Bob the Angry Flower - The Time Looker-Forward Tube">isn’t always what we will do</a>.</p>

<p>And that “I” am not the two wolves. Or I am both of them and more. Or
there is no clear atomic delination between what’s one person and the
next in this cloud of microbiotics and signal substances and neuron
fire. Eww, that got trippy.</p>

<p>Back to the practical tips. One technique I’ve discovered only a few
months ago has been to offer some choices. “OK,” the wolf-on-the-mic
will tell the other. “Option one: you can lie here and if so put a
sleep mask on because it’s bright. Fall asleep or don’t, I don’t care
which. Or, option two, go up and make oatmeal. Either of the two
options are fine by me. It’s fully your choice and I’m happy either
way. Video games can wait because I’m tired and I’m hungry.”</p>

<h2 id="ps">PS</h2>

<p>I don’t usually think of them as wolves, it’s more like “I don’t
wanna” is some kinda frog monkey and “I ought to” is a stern teacher,
but I thought that the wolven imagery might be more readily understood
because of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Wolves" title="Two Wolves - Wikipedia">this meme</a>.</p>

<p>I like that it makes them more similar to each other than different.
That makes the picture clearer.</p>

<p>That meme story is telling you to feed one and starve the other.
That’s not me. I’m with Linehan, either wolf can give you some pretty
bad and destructive ideas. Listen to your heart <a href="/unreasonable" title="Unreasonable">fully</a>.</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-03-18T08:41:31+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/two-wolves"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/noise-positivity"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/noise-positivity</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/noise-positivity">Noise positivity</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>If 40000 people have a problem it’s not very helpful that a thousand
people are loudly and repeatedly clamoring that they don’t have that
problem. That’s true whether that’s 40000 out of 50000 or it’s 40000
out of 1000000.
​
Maybe it’d be slightly less true if it were 40000 out of
1000​000​000​000​000​000​000​000​000​000​000​000 but there aren’t that many
people in known space so maybe be a li’l more respectful when
reporting how you think all’s well and there’s no issue and the problem absolutely does not exist.</p>

        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-03-17T11:28:19+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/noise-positivity"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
  <entry>
    <link rel="self" href="https://idiomdrottning.org/time-flies"/>
    <id>https://idiomdrottning.org/time-flies</id>
    <title type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/time-flies">Existing, fast and slow</a></div></title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	      <div>
        

<p>Time flies like an arrow.<br />
Fruit flies like a banana.</p>

<p>So when you’re a kid it feels like a single week holds more life, more
drama than an entire year later in life. Later, <a href="/subjective-time" title="Subjective time">time feels faster.</a> I’ve lived in the new
apartment for over a year and it feels like that just swooshed by.</p>

<p>You might’ve heard or realized that one reason for this is that a year
as a kid is like one seventh, one eight of your life up until then
while a year for psycho biddies like me it’s like one forty-fifth,
barely an inconvenience, a little over two percent. So time passes
faster and faster because a day is a smaller proportion of your
experience. Not sure how that would literally affect your experience
of the passage of time. It’s not like your shoelace is tighter or
looser for the first loop, or your bookshelf has less room on the left
or you get more tired after the first step on your walk. But just to
stave off any arguments, let’s say I do accept this factor as a
partial explanation.</p>

<p>There’s another factor which causes this effect even more strongly.
Routines make life go way faster than when everything in life is new.
That’s why the fastest, most whooshed-by period in my life was senior
high. Monday to Friday school school school, and I had gotten used to
school and I had moved out from home and I was addicted to IRC and
email and video games. Life in my twenties when I hung out with all
those art weirdos was a much slower and richer time. Every day back
then is like half a decade now that I’ve sorted things out with
Laundry Monday, Vacuum Thursday, Socials Saturday. I’m lonelier now,
too, which also causes this time–speed-up effect.</p>

<p>To slow down time, I’ll make room for some new experiences and for
actually hanging out with real people. Although not sure that’s a good
thing; life as a kid was not exactly easy. Time passing more quickly
because we’re dealing with problems that are more familiar and solved,
with horrors that are not as fresh and raw, that’s not entirely a bad
thing.</p>

<p>寸阴尺璧<br />
分秒必争</p>


        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
    <updated>2025-03-01T05:50:06+01:00</updated>
    <link href="https://idiomdrottning.org/time-flies"/>
    <author>
      <name>Idiomdrottning</name>
      <email>sandra.snan@idiomdrottning.org</email>
    </author>
    </entry>
</feed>

